3 ms·
You can't compare the scales directly across different papers because it's a subjective Mean Opinion Score (MOS) in 0.5 increments, usually taken from a differe
by quantumwoke 6y ago
You can't compare the scales directly across different papers because it's a subjective Mean Opinion Score (MOS) in 0.5 increments, usually taken from a different Mechanical Turk sample. It's a shame that the EATS paper didn't do their own MOS for many of the standard models. However, as pointed out in the paper the real benefits here are in reduced inference/training time and improved attention learning which many of the current models struggle with.
- ma2rten 6y agoEATS and Wavenet are from the same research group. EATS and Tacotron have almost the same score for the human sample. None of the papers said that they used Mechanical Turk. Google has it's own internal MT-like service which is probably more consistent.