3 ms·
My point had nothing to do with politics. This thread is about the need for a code of conduct. The post I'm replying to said they agreed with Peterson, who app
by doctor_eval 6y ago
My point had nothing to do with politics. This thread is about the need for a code of conduct.
The post I'm replying to said they agreed with Peterson, who apparently says that "We are not built on a hierarchy of patriarchy, but a hierarchy of competence". The implication is that a code of conduct is not necessary for open source software because it is a meritocracy.
I'm explicitly and directly refuting this position by using a recent example - out of millions of potential examples - from actual history.
An honest look at the world suggests that it is built neither on a hierarchy of competence nor a hierarchy of patriarchy, but rather, a hierarchy of privilege. It just so happens that white men - myself among them - are the most privileged.
A code of conduct is necessary and good for technical projects because it reduces the ability of one person's privilege and bigotry to be used to subvert another person's merit.
- pnako 6y agoWell, then we agree to some extent, because indeed politicians are not necessarily the most competent. FreeBSD being an international project I doubt any member really benefits from any particular kind of group majority "privilege" or benefit. From my observation, it seems to be way more meritocratic than the outside world.