4 ms·
Your rosy picture of the Linux desktop where software gets along due to standards, etc. does not match up with my (and indeed many others') lived experiences. S
by waddlesplash 6y ago
Your rosy picture of the Linux desktop where software gets along due to standards, etc. does not match up with my (and indeed many others') lived experiences. See my replies elsewhere in this chain about that problem.
- badsectoracula 6y agoI did not present a rosy picture, Linux has its issues, however i wrote that the fragmentation isn't that much of an issue. Your other replies in elsewhere do not really show anything about fragmentation, unless you are confusing having separate projects for different layers of the operating system with fragmentation.
- waddlesplash 6y agoHow is having different pieces of the operating system developed separately not fragmentation? It seems it would be merely by definition.
- tekknik 6y agoDon’t you think this depends on the exact process followed? Different countries built the ISS after all. So long as you plan and standardize properly, and write to the spec, you can develop east subsystem independently and still integrate it as a single, cohesive system.
- badsectoracula 6y agoThen you'd need to explicitly mention your definition of "fragmentation" because i think mine's differ. When i hear about fragmentation i think about incompatibilities, like -e.g.- the home computer fragmentation of the 80s or the Java ME fragmentation of the 2000s. However there are very few incompatibilities between modern Linux distributions and you can avoid them when you are releasing software.