3 ms·
He'll have to get in line. [http://secamlocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/RHproofs.htm http://secamlocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/RHproo...]
by antiform 18y ago
He'll have to get in line. [http://secamlocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/RHproofs.htm http://secamlocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/mrwatkin/zeta/RHproo...]
If you peruse the Number Theory papers on the arXiv, you'll see that there is a purported proof of the Riemann hypothesis every few weeks. So far, none of them have been vetted by a professional journal. I'd be very surprised (but happy) if this turned out to contain a correct proof.
A more interesting question would be "Why is this particular proof by this otherwise unknown author getting so much attention?"
- brent 18y agoAt least two answers to your question: 1) He authored http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li%27s_criterion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li%27s_criterion 2) I believe some theorists have already looked at it and I haven't heard anything negative [disclaimer: I'm far from an expert and wouldn't be able to even agree or disagree with their analyses].