5 ms·
But that would basically make it an awkward Linux distribution that doesn't have much benefits over the existing ones. It seems like an afterthought, a second c
by RivieraKid 6y ago
But that would basically make it an awkward Linux distribution that doesn't have much benefits over the existing ones. It seems like an afterthought, a second class citizen.
Where's the documentation for Chrome OS SDK (for native apps)?
- krn 6y ago> But that would basically make it an awkward Linux distribution that doesn't have much benefits over the existing ones. The main benefits of Chrome OS are immutability and zero-maintenance. If Chrome OS added a native support for flatpak[1], it would cover most of the desktop use cases without losing any of its benefits. [1] https://flatpak.org/ https://flatpak.org/
- dfasdjlf 6y ago> Where's the documentation for Chrome OS SDK (for native apps)? https://developer.android.com/topic/arc https://developer.android.com/topic/arc
- mav3rick 6y agoLinux Files and Apps are first party citizens in the OS. They appear in all menus and settings. You'd develop apps as usual for a Debian distribution. Nothing needs to change.
- WanderPanda 6y agoWhat about battery life? This seems to be a big disadvantage for most Linux distros