Yes, this is great, but I have to disagree on the Intel x86 syntax assertion by the original poster. Perhaps it's because of the era I grew up in and how I fir

Yes, this is great, but I have to disagree on the Intel x86 syntax assertion by the original poster. Perhaps it's because of the era I grew up in and how I first learned machine language and then assembly language, but I've always preferred AT&T syntax. Regardless thanks for supporting the saner syntax even if it's not by default ;)