5 ms·
Thanks so much for sharing your experiences with Prisma! > The main problems I've run into have been around utilizing standard postgres naming patterns (snake
by nikolasburk 6y ago
Thanks so much for sharing your experiences with Prisma!
> The main problems I've run into have been around utilizing standard postgres naming patterns (snake case for tables and fields instead of camelcase) and mapping the names in the prisma schema. Ran into a handful of bugs related to having these mappings that have all been fixed since.
Better re-introspection flows are indeed very much on our radar and something that we want to tackle soon! Would be great if you could leave a comment with your use case on GitHub [1], so we can make sure to address it properly when planning and prioritizing new features! :)
> Better transaction support beyond just nested writes would be great and probably a requirement for a lot of apps.
Same here! It would be really helpful for us if you could share some details about your use cases for transactions in the feature request [2] so that we can incorporate them in our planning and design of the feature!
[1] https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues/2425 https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues/2425
[2] https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues/1844 https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues/1844