5 ms·
Except that it's not PC. My beef is not with it being PC or nPC. It is about questioning the theorie(s) in a scientific manner with rigorously formulated and
by shiven 16y ago
Except that it's not PC.
My beef is not with it being PC or nPC.
It is about questioning the theorie(s) in a scientific manner with rigorously formulated and educated questions. Otherwise, it is merely politics/BS/political-BS.
- jaltucher 16y agoFor the first person who brought up this climate change thread I have a few questions I hope you can answer honestly: A) did it have to do with the article in question? B) Did you see the reference to climate change on wikipedia or you have actually read the chapter on it in my book where I feel I present a very balanced view.
- shiven 16y agoI apologize for not making myself clear. My reply was not directed towards the article or your book, I was replying to the immediate parent only. My ire was directed towards the idea that any criticism of global climate change is bunk simply because it is not PC. I would posit that such criticism, in the context of general public and media, is mostly bunk for the reason I outlined in my first reply.