3 ms·
I'm sorry, I've been reading and re-reading this. Were you being snarky? With perfect forethought, why would anyone ever choose against wiping out the disease e
by tunesmith 6y ago
I'm sorry, I've been reading and re-reading this. Were you being snarky? With perfect forethought, why would anyone ever choose against wiping out the disease early?
- im3w1l 6y agoBecause you think the virus is too contagious and the attempt will fail. Or alternatively, because you don't realize in the beginning that the disease is deadly enough to be worth a lock down.
- thu2111 6y agoBecause that would require global synchronised and incredibly intensive lockdown of the type that has never happened ever before in history. You'd need to eradicate it globally and simultaneously including in war zones, third world countries etc. That's implausible, which is why the only thing that can work is to just let it spread and deal with the fallout. Sometimes called "herd immunity".