oh I have long accepted that and thought I was going to really blow things out of the water with my take-home interview projects. turns out my UI ideas are phe

oh I have long accepted that and thought I was going to really blow things out of the water with my take-home interview projects. turns out my UI ideas are phenomenal, but the mere familiarity and habitual object oriented programming isn't enough if your first thought isn't to use events and presenters and cram that into a 4 hour coding stream of consciousness. this one large prominent company didn't even tell me that they preferred it on github, as a way to further gauge how long it took and commit practices. the recruiter just said you could zip it up over email, and then the submission page on the activity website said submit the git link. but "could" meant, not recommended and creating it a git repository now wouldn't show the utility of the git protocol with one single giant commit at the end. "don't prematurely optimize but show us your best" meant show us your best. gaslight gaslight gaslight. oh but $500K compensation packages are supposed to be hard to get and full of pretentious antipatterns, you should be happy you routinely get call backs in less than 48 hours and are considered for these levels! k.