> I was never happy with the terminology > If you have a problem with it you need to look deep inside yourself and reexamine your own biases. That's where the

> I was never happy with the terminology > If you have a problem with it you need to look deep inside yourself and reexamine your own biases. That's where the real problem lies. So if you are not happy with established terminology you change it but if someone else is not happy with the change he is biased? There are valid reason to be bothered by the change itself, even if the new words are OK. For 1) from the leadership, it is intellectually weak/calculating and fear-based appeasement move to a vocal extremist ideology group; there was nothing wrong with those terms in those contexts. For 2) the change and the associated power play has divisive and desintegrative effect on the project. For 3) it is a nasty manipulation of decent people, unaware of the political power game that is the real motivation behind these calls for new, better terms.