3 ms·
I agree with you – allow/deny is easier to understand anyway for global non-native speaker (which all open source projects are). There are many practical reaso
by atonse 6y ago
I agree with you – allow/deny is easier to understand anyway for global non-native speaker (which all open source projects are).
There are many practical reasons to do this, I just wasn't clear on the race-related reasoning for blacklist/whitelist, as these words don't have those etymologies.
The color black is associated with many non-racial things that we do deem negative, things like death with black clothes at funerals, things like the darkness being the absence of light (sunlight is brighter/whiter), being blinded, where we do mostly see black. None of those things are racial, what should we do about all those?
Perhaps a better change is to stop associating our skin color with those words which are clearly inaccurate, and serve absolutely no useful purpose.
- jgwil2 6y agoI agree that'd be great, but between changing the world's use of black and white and changing our use of blacklist and whitelist as pertains to software, one is in our power and the other isn't. Who knows, maybe someone will even feel more welcomed in our profession as a result.
- atonse 6y agoWhy would one feel unwelcome? We just established the word has nothing to do with race.