ISWYM but I did carefully call it "an intelligence". I strongly agree what you say about it not being like, or obviously related to, or an aspect of, general in

ISWYM but I did carefully call it "an intelligence". I strongly agree what you say about it not being like, or obviously related to, or an aspect of, general intelligence, but I'm happy to call it 'an' intelligence. There's a risk you're defining something out of existence so as not to encroach on an existing definition. Or maybe you're right. This isn't my field.