3 ms·
> I wouldn't call it a "scientific conclusion" That's my point. If it's not scientific, then scientists should not have presented it as such.
by twblalock 6y ago
> I wouldn't call it a "scientific conclusion"
That's my point. If it's not scientific, then scientists should not have presented it as such.
- caconym_ 6y agoWell, a point I've made elsewhere in this thread (possibly not here) is that I don't think they did claim it's an objectively truthful conclusion. I can reason about moving a heavy object from my car to my house using the general knowledge that dropped objects fall downward and often break when they hit the ground; I don't need to whip out the graph paper and prove it.