>That isn't a double standard but a fundamental result of judgement of costs, values, and outcomes. What do you think the definition of a 'double standard' is?

>That isn't a double standard but a fundamental result of judgement of costs, values, and outcomes. What do you think the definition of a 'double standard' is? You know, applying a different standard to the same behaviour (protests). >Circumstances and outcomes vary, a form of 'neutrality' that ignores that fundamentally isn't a useful metric. Sure. And it's still a double-standard. You just associate the phrase 'double-standard' as a negative and you don't like to apply something negative to behaviour you approve of.