Any other argument other than "The data shows x", or "inferring from the data" is probably not science. The author makes solid points, and gives good reasons to

Any other argument other than "The data shows x", or "inferring from the data" is probably not science. The author makes solid points, and gives good reasons to doubt the the climate change consensus, even if those reasons are primarily sociological. EDIT: Seeing a lot of comments going grey in this thread, but not a lot of arguments.