Interesting reasoning behind the distinction the judge made. A router doesn't meet the legal definition of a computer. Here's a judge with some understanding of

Interesting reasoning behind the distinction the judge made. A router doesn't meet the legal definition of a computer. Here's a judge with some understanding of technology. I'm not a lawyer, but I assume in the U.S. this would still qualify as some sort of wire fraud or trespass. No law against illegal use of a telecom network in the Netherlands?