5 ms·

I think the point of the article was that smaller innovations can eventually lead to the greater pushes "that generate large amounts of new economic value" Com

by hansy 16y ago

I think the point of the article was that smaller innovations can eventually lead to the greater pushes "that generate large amounts of new economic value" Coming up with those "big ideas" is an extremely tough thing to do. Often, people who get so enamored with the grand scheme of things engage in endless strategy with no prototype and nothing to show the world. I will agree with you that one should not write off the bigger picture, but sometimes in order to get to the bigger picture you need to put the little pieces in place first

Jsarokin 16y ago
I think just because it is an "extremely tough thing to do" doesn't mean that people shouldn't do it. Sure, people who aren't capable of coming up with a brilliant idea shouldn't do it, but those that are exceptional are better off thinking about the next big idea than a small one. I think its more of a blanket statement to save those who aren't "exceptional" but are just good-very good. If you're good-very good, then yeah stick to the smaller ideas instead of daydreaming about creating the next Microsoft, Apple, Google. Its tough to say, but some people are just better than others. Some people are great. The few that are "great", for the most part, are the ones who will create the next huge thing.
- ay 16y ago
  The creators of Microsoft, Apple, Google were not daydreaming about it. They were busy doing stuff.
- pbrumm 16y ago
  Were microsoft, apple, google thinking they had discovered the next ibm, or yahoo when they were working on their idea? Or were they just working their idea as best they could? creating a revenue stream as quickly as possible and not worrying about trying to be bigger than the previous biggest. I don't think any of the recent companies, google, twitter, facebook, thought that they had an idea that could create companies bigger than any previous ones. they were nothing but an idea that had potential and something people could understand and use in fun/new/helpful ways. And a team who could deliver that idea.

by hansy 16y ago

Jsarokin 16y ago

I think just because it is an "extremely tough thing to do" doesn't mean that people shouldn't do it. Sure, people who aren't capable of coming up with a brilliant idea shouldn't do it, but those that are exceptional are better off thinking about the next big idea than a small one. I think its more of a blanket statement to save those who aren't "exceptional" but are just good-very good. If you're good-very good, then yeah stick to the smaller ideas instead of daydreaming about creating the next Microsoft, Apple, Google. Its tough to say, but some people are just better than others. Some people are great. The few that are "great", for the most part, are the ones who will create the next huge thing.

ay 16y ago
The creators of Microsoft, Apple, Google were not daydreaming about it. They were busy doing stuff.
pbrumm 16y ago
Were microsoft, apple, google thinking they had discovered the next ibm, or yahoo when they were working on their idea? Or were they just working their idea as best they could? creating a revenue stream as quickly as possible and not worrying about trying to be bigger than the previous biggest. I don't think any of the recent companies, google, twitter, facebook, thought that they had an idea that could create companies bigger than any previous ones. they were nothing but an idea that had potential and something people could understand and use in fun/new/helpful ways. And a team who could deliver that idea.