3 ms·
USB-C should’ve been the premium cable- high power charging and fast data transfer guaranteed. USB-A should’ve been used as the cheap cable for simple connectiv
by gurumeditations 6y ago
USB-C should’ve been the premium cable- high power charging and fast data transfer guaranteed. USB-A should’ve been used as the cheap cable for simple connectivity and lower power charging. Devices would naturally sort themselves out over time depending on their price bracket and the volume savings over time of USB-C production.
Instead, the Forum destroyed the entire purpose of USB-C from the getgo by allowing the “universal” cable to be disintegrated for cost-cutting purposes. Now it’s no longer universal. How were they this dumb?
- mjevans 6y agoI half agree. USB-C should have had clear marking standards for TWO cables (at introduction). CHEEP, Dirt cheep, USB 2.0 baseline, minimal PD (compat with the best USB 2.0 ports) plain cable. Full Feature, USB-C premium (with a single color band and trademarked logo in color signifying a 'tested run' of product). Newer versions should have then embellished on that logo.