Incredibly is right! I'm curious how they arrive at that conclusion—what's an acceptable amount of harm to justify infrastructure neglect? The article you link

Incredibly is right! I'm curious how they arrive at that conclusion—what's an acceptable amount of harm to justify infrastructure neglect? The article you linked appears to be about comparing treated water to "raw water", which seems rather tangential to our discussion of considering the quality of treated water. I'm just saying, a lot of people have implicit trust in their water without even knowing what's in it or why 0.62% of americans with perchlorate are somehow clumped in with the americans who are lucky to not have it in their water—surely this would be a success because only 0.62% of water needed extra infrastructure investment and regulation? After all, perchlorate is unlikely to remain at such a low penetration with continued use....