4 ms·

It looks like your link is broken. Is this the preprint you're referring to? "Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink" Imtiaz Nasim, Seungmo Kim https://arx

It looks like your link is broken. Is this the preprint you're referring to? "Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink" Imtiaz Nasim, Seungmo Kim https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03683 https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03683

looneytunes6651 6y ago
Zalyobokskaya NP, 1977. Biological effect of millimeter radiowaves. Vrachebnoye Delo 3: 116-119. Declassified and Approved for release 2012/05/10: CIA-RDP88B01125R000300120005-6 Levedeva NN, Reactions of the central nervous system to peripheral effects of low-intensity EHF emissions. Approved for release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000100070001-9 Potekhina IL, Akoyev GN, Yenin LD, Oleyner 1992 Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation in the millimeter range on the cardiovascular system of the white rat. Fiziol Zh 78:35-41 Numerous other citations showing penetrating effects of millimeter waves are cited in: Betskii OY &Lebedeva NN. Low-intensity millimeter waves in biology and medicine. In: Clinical Application of Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, Marcel Decker, New York, pp. 30-61. A very recent paper came to the same conclusion that millimeter waves produce highly penetrating effects for the same reason, extensive empirical evidence: Kostoff et al (Toxicol Lett 2020:323;35-40).
- jzebedee 6y ago
  Humor me for applying some heuristics here. You're bringing up 43 year old studies and two decade out CIA reports as justification for the health risks of _extremely-widely used_ technology. Should I assume that this is the best we have on offer in studies of a systemic risk, or just cherry picking? Also, why create a throwaway to post this stuff if you're stating an earnest and sincere belief? Surely credible views like these deserve to be held openly.
  - antepodius 6y ago
    That second part's not really fair, is it? 5G conspiracy theorists are an internet laughing stock. I certainly wouldn't want to have my real name attached if I was expressing a view I knew was fringe and would carry social consequences if it were related back to me. Anonymity is a defense against punishment.

looneytunes6651 6y ago

Zalyobokskaya NP, 1977. Biological effect of millimeter radiowaves. Vrachebnoye Delo 3: 116-119. Declassified and Approved for release 2012/05/10: CIA-RDP88B01125R000300120005-6 Levedeva NN, Reactions of the central nervous system to peripheral effects of low-intensity EHF emissions. Approved for release 2000/08/10: CIA-RDP96-00792R000100070001-9 Potekhina IL, Akoyev GN, Yenin LD, Oleyner 1992 Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic radiation in the millimeter range on the cardiovascular system of the white rat. Fiziol Zh 78:35-41 Numerous other citations showing penetrating effects of millimeter waves are cited in: Betskii OY &Lebedeva NN. Low-intensity millimeter waves in biology and medicine. In: Clinical Application of Bioelectromagnetic Medicine, Marcel Decker, New York, pp. 30-61. A very recent paper came to the same conclusion that millimeter waves produce highly penetrating effects for the same reason, extensive empirical evidence: Kostoff et al (Toxicol Lett 2020:323;35-40).

jzebedee 6y ago
Humor me for applying some heuristics here. You're bringing up 43 year old studies and two decade out CIA reports as justification for the health risks of _extremely-widely used_ technology. Should I assume that this is the best we have on offer in studies of a systemic risk, or just cherry picking? Also, why create a throwaway to post this stuff if you're stating an earnest and sincere belief? Surely credible views like these deserve to be held openly.
- antepodius 6y ago
  That second part's not really fair, is it? 5G conspiracy theorists are an internet laughing stock. I certainly wouldn't want to have my real name attached if I was expressing a view I knew was fringe and would carry social consequences if it were related back to me. Anonymity is a defense against punishment.