3 ms·
Nah its mostly gibberish and the few facts in it are cherry-picked. But what would be the point of arguing about it? If someone finds this useful so be it. I
by jaldhar 6y ago
Nah its mostly gibberish and the few facts in it are cherry-picked. But what would be the point of arguing about it? If someone finds this useful so be it.
I will say that the mainstream view is that the Kaliyuga is 432,000 years long and started in ~3102 BC. And it makes little difference to anything in practice what yuga it is.
This only became an obsession with a certain type of Westernized Hindu in the 19th century in the same vein as (and largely in imitation of) the kinds of Christians around that time who were trying to “scientifically” trying to investigate Noah's flood etc.