The person you're responding to wasn't saying that the majority of the US is not directly in a city, but that 5G won't be useful for the majority of that subset

The person you're responding to wasn't saying that the majority of the US is not directly in a city, but that 5G won't be useful for the majority of that subset A third of the population isn't something to disregard. Their suggestion is that a holistic approach could be taken. But maybe this isn't too much an issue of resource allocation (ie 5G deployment may not be zero sum with fiber deployment, particularly if the considered regions are disjoint) Oh well, hopefully Starlink or something can help raise the floor on rural internet access quality