5 ms·
Quite right! In this case, the mailing list writer has built a dichotomy into all their communications: either you say black lives matter or you say "all lives
by newsbinator 6y ago
Quite right! In this case, the mailing list writer has built a dichotomy into all their communications: either you say black lives matter or you say "all lives matter" and therefore you are his enemy.
Whereas the third option, "I'm just here for Javascript tips", wasn't even under consideration.
So unless you engage with and echo their politics, you fall into the enemy camp by default.
- tomjen3 6y agoWhat a world it has come to where you are the enemy if you say all lives matters.
- newsbinator 6y agoThat's not what I meant. I'm saying the absence of any political statement at all makes one the enemy to the writer of this javascript mailing list.
- triplea9 6y agoIf the statement is to be taken at face value, then yes I would agree. But it it shouldn’t be, it’s used a way of denigrating and minimising the concerns of BLM as well as painting the movement as supposed black supremacists when they naturally take offence at the subtext behind the statement.
- _curious_ 6y agoYou are in complete control of how you choose to interpret a statement..and choose you will.
- maceurt 6y agoWhile I disagree with the BLM movement, I think that All Lives Matter was an obvious attempt to rile up people and create unneeded conflict. I don't know what you are referring to when it comes to subtext, as it seems that the ALM movement really started to counter the idea that only black people get killed by police or are victims of hate crimes.