3 ms·
I think most, if not all self-respecting social science scholars would resent being lumped in with economists
by rdcurd 6y ago
I think most, if not all self-respecting social science scholars would resent being lumped in with economists
- gnicholas 6y agoWhich fields are you referring to? I think of psychology as perhaps more rigorous, but none of the others (sociology, anthropology, political science).
- watwut 6y agoSociologists often complains that economists don't bother reading established peer reviewed sociology and opt for own guesswork based on own intuitive observations whenever they attempt to incorporate sociology-lite into their writings.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- FranzFerdiNaN 6y agoAnthropology contains biological anthtopology and archaeology, both of which are a lot more like the physical sciences than psychology.
- dash2 6y agoFWIW experimental economics results seem to be more reproducible than psychology.[1] Though this is a bit of a pot-kettle blackness contest. [1] https://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6280/1433 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6280/1433