4 ms·
While I'm not super up on these newfangled app distribution systems, I've had mostly negative experiences with both Snaps and Flatpaks. As someone that adminis
by charlesdaniels 6y ago
While I'm not super up on these newfangled app distribution systems, I've had mostly negative experiences with both Snaps and Flatpaks.
As someone that administrates a small handful of workstations and a server or two, I just don't get what these tools buy me. It seems that usually installing an application via one of these methods has negative externalities (e.g. some things not working out of box, like access to user file, or ability to play audio), or most often the applications simply don't work at all.
If snaps were able to work properly out of the box, they could be good if they reduce the work for the packagers. That said, I've burned enough of my time trying to debug broken snaps that I won't entertain ever using them again.
I guess if it works for someone else's use case though, that's nice. However it sure seems pretty grubby to install a snap when the user clearly intended to install an DEB package via aptitude.
I will say, I've had very positive experiences with AppImage. I haven't really dug into the technical details of how these different approaches work yet, since I haven't had any reason to, but every AppImage I've wanted to use has always worked perfectly.
- simosx 6y agoThe chromium transition from deb to snap has been discussed here (Note: October 2019) https://snapcraft.io/blog/chromium-in-ubuntu-deb-to-snap-transition https://snapcraft.io/blog/chromium-in-ubuntu-deb-to-snap-tra... Ubuntu could not maintain a deb package, and keep it up to date. Therefore, there is only a snap package. When you try to install with `apt`, you get chromium installed transparently instead of getting a message that describes what I already explained. The breakage would be bad if there was nothing installed when you did a "sudo snap install chromium-browser". AppImages are monolithic images, with no or minimal protection of your computer. I think they are the equivalent of the Windows packages in the 90s and 00s, that were distributed with CDs with little idea where they came from.
- perryizgr8 6y ago> I just don't get what these tools buy me. Nothing. They buy control over you for the distro publisher though.