5 ms·
How do you even define accuracy for an analog process which solves for unknown formulations? Not saying you can't, but afaik there's no ground to call them accu
by EmilioMartinez 6y ago
How do you even define accuracy for an analog process which solves for unknown formulations? Not saying you can't, but afaik there's no ground to call them accurate. It's certaintly chucking a lot of data in functional ways.
- rland 6y agoReaction time and the physical operation of the body are things that seem obvious to me. Try to design a control system for a machine that could replicate a gymnast, for example.
- elcritch 6y agoOr a person walking. Boston’s Dynamics is just now making robots near to animals in their walking ability.
- EmilioMartinez 6y agoSorry, but in my book responsiveness and functionality doesn't have a thing to do with accuracy (neither does parallelism if I may throw it in there).
- rland 6y agoWell, I guess I don't know what you mean by accuracy, then. I'm thinking of the accuracy required to hit the right note in a guitar solo, or the accuracy required to time a clean & jerk correctly, or the accuracy required to track a fast-moving object with the eye. Those things can be surpassed by machines, of course, but if you wanted to design a machine to do all of them? With human efficiency?