3 ms·

In such a polarized emotionally charged environment, some people are unable to emotionally segregate world news from their personal and professional lives. The

In such a polarized emotionally charged environment, some people are unable to emotionally segregate world news from their personal and professional lives. These people have become paralyzed and unable to function normally. They allow world events to bleed into every conversation, and feel obligated to support their side and ostracizing anyone that disagrees - further isolating them in their bubble. I think that social media has increased society's emotional surface area to world events. We no longer isolate 30-60 minutes per day to watch balanced reports on the 6 o'clock news - now it's all the time, hyperbolic, and often deceptive. Our emotions are being weaponized - and November is going to be a real wake-up call where we will see the magnitude of disruptive power that these polarized social media messages can wield.

newsbinator 6y ago
Quite right! In this case, the mailing list writer has built a dichotomy into all their communications: either you say black lives matter or you say "all lives matter" and therefore you are his enemy. Whereas the third option, "I'm just here for Javascript tips", wasn't even under consideration. So unless you engage with and echo their politics, you fall into the enemy camp by default.
- tomjen3 6y ago
  What a world it has come to where you are the enemy if you say all lives matters.
  - newsbinator 6y ago
    That's not what I meant. I'm saying the absence of any political statement at all makes one the enemy to the writer of this javascript mailing list.
  - triplea9 6y ago
    If the statement is to be taken at face value, then yes I would agree. But it it shouldn’t be, it’s used a way of denigrating and minimising the concerns of BLM as well as painting the movement as supposed black supremacists when they naturally take offence at the subtext behind the statement.
    - _curious_ 6y ago
      You are in complete control of how you choose to interpret a statement..and choose you will.
    - maceurt 6y ago
      While I disagree with the BLM movement, I think that All Lives Matter was an obvious attempt to rile up people and create unneeded conflict. I don't know what you are referring to when it comes to subtext, as it seems that the ALM movement really started to counter the idea that only black people get killed by police or are victims of hate crimes.

newsbinator 6y ago

Quite right! In this case, the mailing list writer has built a dichotomy into all their communications: either you say black lives matter or you say "all lives matter" and therefore you are his enemy. Whereas the third option, "I'm just here for Javascript tips", wasn't even under consideration. So unless you engage with and echo their politics, you fall into the enemy camp by default.

tomjen3 6y ago
What a world it has come to where you are the enemy if you say all lives matters.
- newsbinator 6y ago
  That's not what I meant. I'm saying the absence of any political statement at all makes one the enemy to the writer of this javascript mailing list.
- triplea9 6y ago
  If the statement is to be taken at face value, then yes I would agree. But it it shouldn’t be, it’s used a way of denigrating and minimising the concerns of BLM as well as painting the movement as supposed black supremacists when they naturally take offence at the subtext behind the statement.
  - _curious_ 6y ago
    You are in complete control of how you choose to interpret a statement..and choose you will.
  - maceurt 6y ago
    While I disagree with the BLM movement, I think that All Lives Matter was an obvious attempt to rile up people and create unneeded conflict. I don't know what you are referring to when it comes to subtext, as it seems that the ALM movement really started to counter the idea that only black people get killed by police or are victims of hate crimes.