> it was found that all of her allegations of sexual harassment were completely unfounded Do you have a source for this? The courts ruled in Pao v. Kleiner Pe

> it was found that all of her allegations of sexual harassment were completely unfounded Do you have a source for this? The courts ruled in Pao v. Kleiner Perkins that Kleiner Perkins did not discriminate against her. I don't think they ruled on whether or not Ajit Nazre sexually harassed her (or others), and evidence for it was presented in the case. I'm pretty sure they did not rule that the allegations were "completely unfounded." > she was likely just trying to get a settlement to help her dire financial situation Given the publicity around how her case was the first like it, you'd have to be very, very foolhardy to go into it for financial reasons, especially if you didn't think you had a strong case. And if you were going for a settlement, you wouldn't want it to actually go to court if the other side didn't offer one, you'd just withdraw the lawsuit.