It's very clearly anti-Trump (I live in the UK). As for the article, there's this part: "The president was criticised for ordering authorities to forcibly remo

It's very clearly anti-Trump (I live in the UK). As for the article, there's this part: "The president was criticised for ordering authorities to forcibly remove peaceful protesters from a square outside the White House so he could cross the street to take a photo in front of a church." Wasn't it the AG that ordered the protesters to be moved? Either way, who cares. This is HN, not reddit (although sometimes I wonder)