4 ms·

It's so sad to see the BBC caught up in all this. It used be a reputable news source, the BBC World Service was just that - listened to the world over. Now it'

It's so sad to see the BBC caught up in all this. It used be a reputable news source, the BBC World Service was just that - listened to the world over. Now it's this.

detaro 6y ago
What do you mean by "caught up in all this"? It shouldn't report about this happening? You don't like some wording they use?
- dirtydroog 6y ago
  It's very clearly anti-Trump (I live in the UK). As for the article, there's this part: "The president was criticised for ordering authorities to forcibly remove peaceful protesters from a square outside the White House so he could cross the street to take a photo in front of a church." Wasn't it the AG that ordered the protesters to be moved? Either way, who cares. This is HN, not reddit (although sometimes I wonder)
  - davmar 6y ago
    I think your delicate opinions will be more comfortable on gab instead of HN or reddit. Bye.
  - moistly 6y ago
    > Wasn't it the AG that ordered the protesters to be moved? (A) Barr denies it. (B) The buck stops at the President's desk.
robocat 6y ago
The BBC has a bias, so what? They usually get their facts straight, and sometimes the spin is not to my liking, but that doesn’t mean it is poor journalism.