3 ms·
My point is that, in the absence of the Bolt, there would have been a stronger argument for saving the Volt because of it's role as a compliance car. The succe
by cptskippy 6y ago
My point is that, in the absence of the Bolt, there would have been a stronger argument for saving the Volt because of it's role as a compliance car.
The success of the Bolt removed any argument for keeping the Volt around.
- WorldMaker 6y agoThe Volt wasn't a compliance car and the only argument you've presented from what I can read is a tautology focused around the fact that it was canceled so therefore was a compliance car, which doesn't make sense given the factors that were involved in it being canceled. It wasn't canceled because it was a compliance car. It wasn't canceled because the Bolt was successful. It was canceled because GM shuttered their entire lineup of sedans.