I think you misunderstood his point. He is saying that in his system severity == priority. His article he linked lists out explicitly his buckets. Within a giv

I think you misunderstood his point. He is saying that in his system severity == priority. His article he linked lists out explicitly his buckets. Within a given severity I think its then a judgement call of a product owner to rack-and-stack the issues in priority order, exactly how it would be done for traditional 'P1' - 'P5' grading.