Who said it needs to support vectorization natively? It's not what Go was created for so it's fine to exist as a library or assembly code. Go has stricter goal

Who said it needs to support vectorization natively? It's not what Go was created for so it's fine to exist as a library or assembly code. Go has stricter goals than Java or .NET. So comparing them favorably is like saying a Corolla sucks because it lacks features present in a heavy duty truck. Again, Intel's article doesn't advocate for any method. It just presents results. Anyone can read the article and conclude for themselves that you're extrapolating to the worse interpretation possible as usual.