3 ms·
Spam is a numbers game. If you make it harder for spam messages to be sent out, spammers 1. send less spam by default 2. increase hardware. (realize 2 can also
by jemka 16y ago
Spam is a numbers game. If you make it harder for spam messages to be sent out, spammers 1. send less spam by default 2. increase hardware. (realize 2 can also include increase cost if not using a "free" bot-net)
If all SMTP servers were required to receive and send back a token/packet before their original message was delivered, the bandwidth/cpu etc... required to send the message will have increased.
Send original to recipient server, receive from recipient server, send to recipient server. Then the mail is delivered.
Example: A single spammer can send out 50 million emails / month on current system. Introduce a 3-way & that number drops.
If the spammer wants to get back to sending 50 million / month, a significant increase in hardware will be required.
- silentbicycle 16y agoIn my experience, spamd (http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=spamd http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=spamd) is remarkably effective, and its greylisting works by requiring a request/response before the first valid transmission.