5 ms·
Telegram indeed have better UX and same level of e2e security. Why Signal is getting all the publicity?
by romanr 6y ago
Telegram indeed have better UX and same level of e2e security. Why Signal is getting all the publicity?
- nix23 6y agoTelegram is not opensource, Signal is...and yes you can setup your own server with Signal. Why trust a Closed-source-Software? Do you even know that it is encrypted?
- fsflover 6y agoYou can setup your own server with Signal, but you will not participate in the same network, so this is not really relevant.
- nix23 6y agoFor Country's or big-business it is relevant
- sorenjan 6y agohttps://github.com/DrKLO/Telegram https://github.com/DrKLO/Telegram https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop
- nix23 6y agoTHAT is not the server, its like saying Firefox is opensource so Facebook is too, thanks and no thanks for the link's.
- sorenjan 6y agoThe encryption takes place in the client though, which you can verify by looking at the client source code. I find your comparison with Facebook a bit lacking, a better one would have been by looking at the Firefox code to verify if https traffic is encrypted.
- detaro 6y agoTelegram has off-by-default E2E encryption with a less vetted algorithm that only works for 1:1 chats, and less focus on minimizing server knowledge. That's clearly not > same level of e2e security
- prophesi 6y agoAnd both users need to be online at the same time for the E2E-encrypted chat. Very limiting.