4 ms·
Not the most auspicious introduction (for me at least) to Sarah Lacy.
by timcederman 16y ago
Not the most auspicious introduction (for me at least) to Sarah Lacy.
- btucker 16y agoYeah, totally. Though I think I remember reading that it was her editors who really controlled that story (and the title/cover). In any case, I've been pleased to see her appear to grow tremendously as a journalist over the past few years.
- joshu 16y agoIndeed. Lying to your subjects about what the article is about is scummy as hell.
- _pius 16y agoJust out of curiosity, what was the article supposed to be about?
- joshu 16y agoNew entrepreneurs. Instead it was more about Kevin's posse or something.
- ojbyrne 16y agoI was not really involved in the article but in the follow on book she put words in my mouth (presumably from someone else, but who knows) that I never said, without any attempt at verification. In an ideal world, she should not be working. But hello, Techcrunch.