3 ms·
The round-trip is not 140 miles to a satellite at 340 miles. Regarding cable placement, in some cases it's circuitous. But sometimes not, expecially in 2020.
by redis_mlc 6y ago
The round-trip is not 140 miles to a satellite at 340 miles.
Regarding cable placement, in some cases it's circuitous. But sometimes not, expecially in 2020.
- Retric 6y agoYou misunderstood. (Ignoring the earth being a sphere.) A satellite directly overhead means you need to travel to that altitude. However, if it’s not overhead light is traveling the hypotenuse of a right triangle where X is the distance to a point underneath the satellite and Y is the altitude of the satellite. That distance is the square root( X^2 + y^2). From there you need to travel to a different base station. Assuming an ideal path where the satellite is directly between two locations that are 680 miles apart, that adds up to 2 * ( sqrt(340^2 + 340^2) ) ~= 961.7 miles vs 340 + 340 miles, or an added 281.7 miles not 680. In other words 1.414x the distance rather than simply adding 680. Clearly the earth is not a flat and your very unlikely to be in that situation, but assuming you can reach several satellites at the same time it is likely one of them will be roughly in the direction you want to go.