3 ms·
This isn't passing off. The logo was placed on the part by Apple. The consumer isn't being deceived; the consumer never even sees the logo! This is discussed el
by rlpb 6y ago
This isn't passing off. The logo was placed on the part by Apple. The consumer isn't being deceived; the consumer never even sees the logo! This is discussed elsewhere here already.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- nojito 6y agoHow do you know that? The part was imported into the country. The customer is 100% being deceived.
- rlpb 6y agoBecause the article says "...the Oslo District Court ruled in 2018 that Huseby did not violate Apple’s trademark, because Huseby never claimed to be using unused original spare parts". A court found that the customer wasn't being deceived, and this specific finding has not been overturned on appeal. The issue is about IP rights unrelated to customer deception.