4 ms·
It wears off. I used d for quite a while, and I still think it's much better than c++. However, it's ultimately just more of the same: an incoherent, tangled
by moonchild 6y ago
It wears off.
I used d for quite a while, and I still think it's much better than c++. However, it's ultimately just more of the same: an incoherent, tangled mess. Slightly more coherent, slightly less tangled, sure. It's possible to iterate on garbage, but you still wouldn't want to serve it at a restaurant. Worse, it has politics. Prominent d users regularly talk about forking the language/compiler; not because of any specific language pain points, but because of pathological problems with the way the language is developed.
The main compiled/native language to watch imo is cone[1], though most of its ideas are not yet implemented. Zig is also decent, and closer to production-ready.
1. http://cone.jondgoodwin.com/ http://cone.jondgoodwin.com/
- giancarlostoro 6y agoNeat, have you looked at V yet? https://vlang.io/ https://vlang.io/
- moonchild 6y agoV is a joke. I don't understand why anyone takes it seriously.
- giancarlostoro 6y agoIt's current capabilities are probably why. I don't see it as ready yet, but its interesting how much it does in such a short span of time.