5 ms·
That's a hypothetical I disagree with. Politicians will always address their counterparts and should always try to inform their constituents. It's up to the co
by s_y_n_t_a_x 6y ago
That's a hypothetical I disagree with.
Politicians will always address their counterparts and should always try to inform their constituents. It's up to the constituents to stay educated.
Censoring politicians because people might be too stupid is a really bad reason.
- volkk 6y agosure, but realistically this is exactly what has been happening if you just look at the last few years. many people are extremely misinformed and there are tons of propaganda campaigns. finding the real truth is borderline impossible. what is the solution? continue as is until someone more and more radical comes along bending truth to their will? there's gotta be some middle ground between a ministry of truth and just completely lawlessness.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 6y ago> if you just look at the last few years No, you've been told that because people aren't happy with the current status quo. There has always been propaganda and the truth is always possible to find. Unless you have something specific I feel like you're using hyperboles (think of the children!!!) to win your way. It's not lawlessness, people aren't extremely misinformed (if they are that's on them), the truth isn't borderline impossible. This truth hunt will die out when the people seeking it are back in charge. Yes remove threats, but don't remove lies. Having lies on your platform is not lawlessness, it's the internet. If you don't want lies then take 230 away from them and make them take down libel/slander/lies that EVERYONE says, not just the people they choose to target.