> It sounds like he was passing off non-apple parts as actual apple parts (by not properly removing the logo) From the article, it doesn't sound like that to m

> It sounds like he was passing off non-apple parts as actual apple parts (by not properly removing the logo) From the article, it doesn't sound like that to me at all. It sounds like Apple deliberately put the logo on individual parts to try and make this claim later. But the logo on the part itself presumably isn't visible on the finished product. Even if it were, it would still not be passing off because the part did originally come from Apple!