5 ms·
It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with the quote, the concern OP had was that Facebook was refusing to apply its policies against glorifying violence (
by yifanl 6y ago
It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with the quote, the concern OP had was that Facebook was refusing to apply its policies against glorifying violence (and the quote absolutely is) to specific individuals.
(Certainly the POTUS is not the average person, but Twitter's solution of marking that his comment was against terms of use is an extremely easy compromise.)
- pedro_hab 6y agoThis argument is the best I found here, doesn't pander to emotions. But Trump even clarified he meant that this is what he thought it would happen, and it did happen. We could pointlessly argue if he did mean that or if he was trying to cause violence. I'm not sure we should censor someone based in what we think the person meant for it. I still think this is all nonsense caused by a sensitive topic, nonsense being calling for Trump to be censored. I am arguing if he should be censored and people are responding as if I think people should be killed for protesting.