3 ms·
That analogy does not work though. Landmine's sole purpose is to kill/injure whoever steps on it. I don't use Facebook much, but plenty of people have benefited
by tjchear 6y ago
That analogy does not work though. Landmine's sole purpose is to kill/injure whoever steps on it. I don't use Facebook much, but plenty of people have benefited from it.
Instead of personal cost to him, I'd rather view it through the lenses of the impact of his action. It's inviting a lot of constructive conversation and making people re-evaluate Mark's decisions, which I think overall is a net positive.
- luckylion 6y ago> I don't use Facebook much, but plenty of people have benefited from it. Namely those who hold stock options or who used it to hyper target unsuspecting fools and scam them. > Instead of personal cost to him, I'd rather view it through the lenses of the impact of his action. Let's. The "constructive conversation" has been going on already. This doesn't move the needle on that conversation, it's not one with a lot of grey area where the world is on the fence. This is great - for him. But not much else.
- tjchear 6y ago> Namely those who hold stock options Oh sure those too. But small businesses benefit from it immensely, e.g using fb live and fb groups to connect with their customers for example. > Let's. The "constructive conversation" has been going on already. This doesn't move the needle on that conversation, it's not one with a lot of grey area where the world is on the fence. This is great - for him. But not much else. If that's the case, what do you think he should have done, or we should have done?