I don't see how protecting your property is fascist. I agree that a life is worth much more than any property, but stealing might lead to the death of the vict

I don't see how protecting your property is fascist. I agree that a life is worth much more than any property, but stealing might lead to the death of the victim, so you are not just protecting property. They could use non lethal force, but it's not radical to think it could escalate. I think your comment sums it up, Trump needs to be censored in the pursue of societal change, which is a political statement. Should a platform be making political statements and have protection as if they are neutral?