We need a better framework for discussing speech issues in general. Even here arguments devolve into semantics over what the first amendment applies to when we

We need a better framework for discussing speech issues in general. Even here arguments devolve into semantics over what the first amendment applies to when we should really be discussing how we actually expect/want society to function. Maybe we can adopt RFC language. Example: must: A law should/does enforce this must-not: A law should/does forbid this should: You have the right to NOT do this, but I believe this is what should be done should-not: Although you have the right to do this, I believe you shouldn't do this social media platforms (must|must-not) have the right to police speech social media platforms (should|should-not|must|must-not) police speech