5 ms·
Not mentioned: the dead salmon study of 2009 that outed a bunch of fMRI studies as using incorrect statistics, and which went on to win an ignoble prize. [1] h
by dzdt 6y ago
Not mentioned: the dead salmon study of 2009 that outed a bunch of fMRI studies as using incorrect statistics, and which went on to win an ignoble prize.
[1] https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/scicurious-brain/ignobel-prize-in-neuroscience-the-dead-salmon-study/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/scicurious-brain/ignobe...
- SubiculumCode 6y agoIt is not mentioned because it is not relevant. The dead salmon experiment highlighted that some researchers were failing to correct for multiple comparisons sufficiently. This article is talking about the test-retest reliability of the fMRI measure in individuals. edit: Instead of down voting, perhaps moderators might write how that experiment is actually relevant.
- seesawtron 6y agoI agree: dead salmon study outlines the flaws of Statistics. This study outlines the flaws/limitations of poorly formed experimental paradigms to which fMRI is not immune. Its like comparing applies to oranges.