Since you have only provided one meaningful example, I will focus on it. >> that being you said, “Foucault, for example, was successful not because he said tru

Since you have only provided one meaningful example, I will focus on it. >> that being you said, “Foucault, for example, was successful not because he said true things, but because he said new and previously unimaginable things, and expressed them lyrically.” >> Wikipedia: “Foucault's theories primarily address the relationship between power and knowledge, and how they are used as a form of social control through societal institutions.” Your reasoning in sum appears to be that you don’t understand something, so it must be without merit. Sure, one might argue that Foucault's theories lack mathematical proofs, but to argue against them without as much is no better. What proof do you have Foucault's theories depart from reality?