4 ms·
As the looks of it, US is pretty non-free when it comes to peacefully protesting. So I guess this feature is very timely and directed towards users there ;)
by ictebres 6y ago
As the looks of it, US is pretty non-free when it comes to peacefully protesting. So I guess this feature is very timely and directed towards users there ;)
- vinay427 6y agoIt's most certainly not just the US. In the (western European) country where I live, for instance, even a static protest or demonstration with no chanting or marching and only a few participants requires non-trivial and somewhat expensive police approval ahead of time. Most larger spontaneous events seem to just ignore this and the police haven't generally responded violently, to their credit.
- yters 6y agoWhat makes you thinks that? When I think non free, I think of the CCP prohibiting peaceful rememberance of Tianamen square.
- erikbye 6y ago> As the looks of it, US is pretty non-free when it comes to peacefully protesting What is your definition of peaceful protest? What we see in the US now is definitely not within my range. Thrashing stores, looting, torching vehicles.