The errors are indeed found, eventually, like this time. It's the expectancy of anything being completely "error free" from the start is simply false. Compare w

The errors are indeed found, eventually, like this time. It's the expectancy of anything being completely "error free" from the start is simply false. Compare with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23412482 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23412482 Look at the all the infrastructure involved there, all the automatic tests that exist in the originating infrastructure, and still only 1) an independent fuzzing test by the company with the most computers in the world 2) the work of the leader of another project; bring "medial" attention to the existence of the problem. Nothing can be always perfect in the first try. In science specifically, the "intentional frauds" aren't the starting assumption of those who do review, that's why the frauds manage to pass the checks that do work most of the time. "Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it." Johnatan Swift (1667-1745)